Since when is The O9A abstraction free? That's kinda like saying Kaballah is abstraction free. If that was true NAOS would be a cover page and then nothing. Maybe a few words, "Invalid input" or "You're on your own". Then, The End. Maybe publish The Star Game separately. Yet, there are mounds of bullshit text to follow, and some horrible writen MSS that defines abstraction. Seems much better used as bait by three letter agencies to entrap racist dumbfucks.
I forget which loquacious autistic (John Hughes social outcast) always talked about abstraction and the visceral, because only bootlicking followers latched on to it. And then missed the point entirely. And sometime I don't even think the writer knew what he or she was talking about. Because it's kinda hard to tell with those accounts, who is a mister and who is a misses.
IT'S ACTIONS! REAL WORLD SHIT!
Now follow a bunch of steps of self-initiation like a little bitch. But at least you get to rank yourself. In part to my little bitch-boy dog account here I am now "Grand Mousa Exemptus Super-Adeptus." All the highest ranks at once.
My real world deeds are many, and the adeptness is adept. This is where the dog's tail wags.
As far as Doggy's autistic mommy example, it's just a device. More attempted shock value. Not for you, but the magical minded superstitious person. The quote unquote satanist/occult person may say, "Three fold laws, and ethics, and respect for dark arts!" Even came up with it using a dishonor metric. "What's the most offensive thing to publicly transgress dark arts with?" And because both parents, like yourself, are deceased, the intent is moot, even in magicland.
And with all those ethics, what's a truly divergent path?
Perhaps they realize they are still mentally Christian (or at least acknowledge a rudimentary ethics that is naturally occuring) and accept they are normal? They sure haven't changed much. Still very much on a guided hike up the mountain, following (or deliberately transgressing) that underlying moral compass. NOT REALLY A DIFFERENT PATH. Theism v. Atheism is irrelevant. Still referencing the undelying coding of the social animal. Which is all anyone does.
But nobody who takes this shit seriously is around anymore. Not that I've really looked.
Still, I guess this account is stuck here with you.
Well, when I wanna come in here and shit-talk "Satanism" and mock it for being dogmatic, superstitious, and ultimately still "Christian". Which most are probably better off with anyway.