Welcome to the point of know(no) return; enjoy the fall.
I love this song [!!!]:
Welcome to the point of know(no) return; enjoy the fall.
- CLAMI
Edit : (M)usic was supposed to be in there
I tried this. I made up my own list of words, but then had to drop and rearrange them in order to form an acronym that wasn't complete gibberish. I create and delete often, and this would qualify as a deletion, but what the fuck : (C)ontemplation; (L)iterary Articulation; (A)ltered States; (I)ntelligence.
- CLAMI
CLAMI lol. That's cuz you're doing it backwards where your trying to make acronyms duh!
You're supposed to make a Backronym!
When you are backronyming, you start off with a word first, then you make each letter of that word into the initial of a new word. Like this:
S = Sweet
A = And
T = Tremendously
A = Articulate
N = Nina [Spanish for girl].
The Five Percenters make a whole religion out of backronyming to give old ideas new twists and meanings. They took the word and concept of ALLAH and made it into an atheistic/humanistic meaning:
Arm
Leg
Leg
Arm
Head
Which is a human being.
They took the word ISLAM and backronymed it to mean the worship of the Self as the only God/Allah:
I
Self
Lord
And
Master
Meaning that "I" my Self am my own lord and master.
(I)cky
(G)ross
(N)eanderthal
(O)bstinate
(R)immer
(A)nus
(N)utjob
(T)otal Idiot
The Wall Of Pretentiousness
I assert there are five phases associated with belief. The five phases are as follow: ignorance, idea, knowledge, experience, and being. Some of these phases are comprised of micro-phases termed ‘levels’. Each phase raises the power of evidence, to build extra length onto the philosophical ladder permitting the individual to reach greater heights to overcome obstacles for the individual who is subject to the IEP (Idea, event, or proposal) which is an ambiguous concept being tested by the individual for belief purposes. The IEP is an ambiguous concept that is the ‘subject’ being tested for belief. The subject is the IEP being tested as an equivalent to being a ‘philosophical wall’ blocking an individual from belief. The IEP is the subject of processing through this belief model attempting to build a ‘warrant’, which is the ability of an individual to perform a task. In the case of belief, the warrant is the ability to believe. This warrant may be executed for belief with ‘evidence’. The evidence used to execute the warrant is the philosophical ladder; the tool required to overcome the presence of a tall obstacle. This evidence must accurately measure to the ‘standard of evidence’, the height of the philosophical ladder, to compel belief to allow the individual to believe, jump over an obstacle, the subject thus causing the individual to accept the IEP. Doing so permits belief to exist in regards to the IEP of study.
I noticed Infernal Acumen has posted a couple of recent responses here. I appreciate the effort, but am still a bit perplexed and left in the dark. Having a memory of direct experience of demons, of spirits, and of souls is implied in Infernal Acumen’s claims of spiritual awareness, etc.
Just to clarify. What I am hoping to obtain here is:
A phenomenological description of these direct experiences: I am seeking a description of the intentional conscious structures, which are underlying Infernal Acumen’s conscious connectedness with the object of these experiences.
A concise claim regarding the ontical and ontological status of the objects of these experiences, and the nature of the Being, or metaphysical reality, within which these objects of experience appear.
An understanding of the epistemological or knowledge connection between Infernal Acumen as an experiencing subject and the object of these experiences and the wider question of Being or metaphysical reality within which those objects appear.
I know the above is a pretty big ask, and may be difficult to conceptualize and articulate, but we should be able to move forward, if the response is kept simple and sincere.