The "Islamic" Problem | Forum

YOU CANT BE A MARTYR IF YOU WILLINGLY PUT YOURSELF IN THE POSITION TO BE ADMONISHED. 

That's like sitting in a shitty car in a drug area and then accusing the cops of harassment when they stop to see why you are sitting in a shitty car in a drug area. 

You gonna play the "oppressed and stereotyped male" victim card too? 

You're a female moderator mocking him. Ergo you are getting in the way of his will to power and free speech! 

It's triggered his trauma response and he sees his ability to prattle on here threatened.  

There was a stolen Weeds comment here about how you could wear his metaphorical SIN teeth on a necklace and make him worship you as a god, but I took too long to post and it was out of place.  

So like you say, carry on I guess. 

The Church of Sacred Desecration

The practice of the Church is to organize public blasphemy as part of its religious practice. 

The ONE IDEAL being: May no one ideal be made sacred or beyond reproach. 

"Today we are going to be desecrating The Quran and stoning an effigy of the Kabba" 

Subsequent gatherings could desecrate ANYTHING made sacred by any society. By design the Church plays no favorites and is equal opportunity across the board. Its meant to offend without cause other than "for the cause of offending". 

You could even desecrate Ideas of culture with excessive costumed pageantry too. Make it artistic. 

You could do a public ritual of a white nazi cop kneeling on a black guy and then a bunch of people dressed as snowflakes running around with signs rioting one year on the anniversary. 

And then turn around and do a mock terrorism and herd minded patriotism/conservative theme on 9/11. 

All you have to do to desecrate LGBT taboo is not cry crocodile tears for the struggle of marginalized androgeny. Start the "If you can see it, you can be it" campaign during pride week. Trans-objectism. Have people identify as toasters. And if that doesn't work get on a stage and yell pejorative slurs for an hour. 

The Church would focus on destroying what is sacred (off limits), not because they're hate filled monsters, but because the public desecration of societal idols and taboo smashing is fulfilling.  And people bitching and getting offended all the herd-minded time is fucking annoying. 

Nevertheless, there's a difference between blasphemy and just being an asshole. Assholery can be Vamachara but that's one of the reasons I dropped Vamachara from my philosophy. Assholery is for adolescents. I'm too old for that shit. I mean, why don't we just knock on people's doors and run away? Or call them on the phone and ask them if their refrigerator is running?

Blasphemy is a very different matter. Religion is a blight upon the earth. It cries out for desecration.

The point of the thought was the aggregate of doing it to everything. It attempts to end righteous indignation through desensitization to trolling. 

Basically the most offensive version of South Park as street theater. Make it well known you "want to piss everyone off equally". 

In fairness my pet leave is righteous indignation. Whether evangelical or antifa. It takes things out of context, spins them, and turns it into a mob.  To mock the predilections of society that meltdowns and shuns.  All of them.

The cult of sacred cow slaughter.

Ultimately It wouldn't work because it is juvenile to do for the sake of pissing off everyone. And in practice no Satanist would care about the righteous indignation until it makes unnecessary demands of them. So herding cats and shit. 

Righteous indignation is always hypocritical on some level. Whatever we're indignant about, the underlying general principle will be something we're entirely capable of committing ourselves under the right circumstances. Slavery? The underlying general principle is dehumanization. I, for my part, am not only capable of dehumanization, but in fact I actually perpetrate it, with regard to zealous religionists. The Muslim on his knees praising Allah looks utterly subhuman to me. Hell, he looks sub-mammalian. Given the choice whether to save the life of a squirrel or a practicing Muslim, I would save the squirrel. My loathing is so great that I would be tempted by a regime where, let's say, Muslims were given a choice: renounce Allah or be subjected to slavery. Their very existence offends me. The only reason I would reject the proposed regime is this: It may be Muslims today, but tomorrow it could be anti-Muslims who get put in chains. For our own ultimate safety we have to reject all chains categorically.

Here's a name for your movement: "Righteous Indignation Be Damned!"

Islam for Denmark, this is the end result of the liberal ideal.

Democracy is a joke, if you haven't figured it out by now you're a simpleton. Go work on on the farm little peasant.