© Copyright Satanic International Network
The typical mundane will not question the above, if for no other reason, than the simple fact that it would be counterproductive to fantasy.
However, in all fairness, it may be inquired as to what it is exactly that places one absurdity above another, since in the end, it is all one is truly left with, an ultimate truth concealed via paradoxes, or, a 'veil' so to speak.
Ultimate truth to be for those only who are able to disregard its' implications and elevate themselves to a higher standard of reasoning.
Although in lieu of the living forever facade the task at hand will be evaluating the compatibility of infinite linearity with eternity which serves to encapsulate the former.
The emergence of a beginning, without end, appropriately referred 'infinitely linear' where a distinction is made in comparison with the eternal as it does in fact have a beginning, ergo, there be finite linear, infinite linear, and of course circular(eternal) time, with the latter also serving as negation of time.
So which one of these is right within this labyrinth of indecision, which will remain once the waters of transcendental reasoning have cleansed the mind of all the clutter, staring into the Abyss, to see nothing, and nothing, from which even the Abyss itself has emerged.
- Occams' Razor
The Wall
They both seemingly occupy zero spatial dimensions prior to any expansion; the dimension of time being isolated and existing only within as an initial and primary dimensional catalyst.
The macrocosmic time is observed as change 'without', or external to the individual, while microcosmic time is observed as change 'within', or simply as a passing of intervals, or, moments.
The time within the microcosm appears similar to the time within the primordial (singularity) which allows change, and therefore, expansion. The acausal would be prior to all this and best for another entry.Well consciousness is the proposed analogy, although it serves as an inferior, but plausible reflection. The primordial consciousness creates a four dimensional spacetime construct, apparently from no...See more
A "cosmological constant" cannot reverse, that's why it's a constant. Infinity cannot contract nor expand as it is already omnipresent. The CC has been relegated to M-theory as "the bulk".I was just going to play a game of Chess and then I realized that the very first sentence of the very first comment here is what would be referred a "blunder" of an opening in Chess.
...See more
Sorry, I'm stoned and that's the response that came out. Sorta pot and kettle considering stuff I've posted.The cosmological reflex of the polarity within the information exchange causes an integer variation along the z axis, this equating proportionally to a feedback loop of the subscripted narrative. If w...See more
I just can't do space/time from consciousness. I think (my idea is that) it's a closed system. An insignificant bubble popped into existence from a fluctuation in a zerodimensional nothingness of every conceivable type of bubble that could pop into existence (dynamics of strings applied to fit field thoery). And after the system inflates and closes not even dark matter/energy escapes relativistic explanation. Hypothetical Wormholes just fold distant points to you and dark matter/energy is what happens when a white hole expels all the inverted versions of the shit it swallowed. Once the universe ages enough for white holes to 'outweigh' blackholes an unseen acceleration is logical.
Unfortunately being part of a specific universe in a closed system prevents direct observation of how utterly insignificant this universe really is. The place for acausal was a vacuum peturbation that occured for fraction of a microsecond at inflation. Or something.In all seriousness you should check out Ancient Egypt Cosmology. Basically before there was anything there was a primordial sea called nun which had no form or likeness. Then the universe burst out of...See more
The other alternative would be a cosmological constant in which spacetime has always existed, i.e. it is infinite and eternal, unless of course you would believe in an infinite and eternal vacuum from within which the acausal functions, but for good reason, I choose to believe that spacetime is also emergent as a function of the acausal.And as for the "acausal", in the context that I use it, it just simply means emergence without cause, since, if there is nothing in existence, then there is nothing to cause anything. So thi...See more