My New Satanic Family from Anna's blog
Personally, I have nothing against theists or any spiritually inclined people but the religious fanaticism is more than any reasonable person can bear. Arguing with fanatics can be fun but if they are in the moderation team, it's pointless. But before I'm out, I think I will share some pearls of wisdom I found there because I think that black and white tunnel vision of the world and revisionist history are hilarious. So enjoy and Hail Satan!
Yes Atheists will not like it here .. Anton LaVey actually believed in what he was calling forth .He believed in SATAN . He wasn't a stupid atheist.. For atheism it didn't come into play until the big separation in 1975 and I can prove it.. The Church of Satan was theistic COMPLETELY.. All paths of the Left Hand path Are welcome here ..True Atheism IS NOT SATANIC AT ALL and Atheism is COMPLETELY MUNDANE... I can prove that also.. That crap has no business in true Satanic currents.. If you mix them your path will never be complete.. This is why I dont go into in SIN anymore .. TO many of the ppl in the are Atheists . That's Fucking DISGUSTING AND RETARDED .... So with that said if you are a Gilmore Satanist wich he is COMPLETELY into hearded conformity just like the idiot's of the tst .. Its time to bring IT BACK TO BEDROCK....
There's no room for atheism. If you go before 75 you'll see atheism did not exist until the big separation Lavey actually believed in what he was calling forth
You should familiarize yourself what is this great book it is built into our structure for this book is a part of our library and recommended reading..
if you're against the Temple of set ,Michael A etc . I don't think you will like it here... Especially when you want to badmouth something you actually have no idea or understanding about.... You proved it in what you just said about the book you totally are wrong ,our conversation is over....
The Wall
"If you doubt the power of magic you will lose all you've gained."
But what of the power of the Space Mongoose?
This wishy-washy ethereal recognition is fairly common agnostic fence sitting. A demonstration of the grip of cultural superstition. It is sorta like using "but" in a sentence, it invalidates everything you said before it.
Like, "You are the god and these ideas are all inventions of fallible man, *but* you must be mindful of some of these manmade inventions because it is totally real."
If not written for pure "devil in the details" irony it is a contradiction of every materialist thing written previously.Playing Devils advocate here:
"If you doubt the power of magic you will lose all you've gained."
But what of the power of the Space Mongoose?
T...See more
"THE definition of magic, as used in this book, is: "The change in situations or events in accordance with one's will, which would, using normally accepted methods, be unchangable."
Clearly his words suggest he believed in some unfounded mystical bullshit. You can't really insert rationale into the acausal. You can try to copout with psychodrama reasons all you want but it is still wishy washy fence sitting agnosticism. And maybe the only trick the devil pulled here was convincing "atheists" magic isn't a religious herd-minded superstition.
I prefer to think he was capitalizing on all that Age of Aquarius - New Age - Norman Vincent Pelle shit, because even if you take his writing at face value he is still banking on all that space "open for interpretation". There's a lot of faith in, "Don't question it if it appears to work, even if there's no way to know for certain".
Apart from that, it is strait confirmation bias with no regard for statistical chance or validity. Nary a regard for all the times it didn't happen, or the times when back luck happens to an adversary without your belief of being a special acausal snowflake.Yeah but LaVey also said,
"THE definition of magic, as used in this book, is: "The change in situations or events in accordance with one's will, which would, using normally a...See more