Sign In
The 600 Club | Forum
Owner Zach Black
Apr 2
Looks like the 600 club the oldest and first network for Satanists online is gone. Anyone know if this is temporary or what happened. I can not get a hold of the owner Xear either.
Share:
Anna
Apr 4
"I cannot get a hold of the owner Xear either."
Is he alive? Maybe coronavirus got the better of him :/
Owner
Dark Enlightenment
Apr 13
I heard it was the server getting old and being on the verge of total collapse. I read they have an 8 year life span and if my site was driven into the ground by government shills and then finished off when only posters like myself remained to argue with their sock accounts and pimp their marginally listenable music, apathy would likely win..
C'est la vie. No more quality people wanting him to bring it back either. And it even then, the last t ime it left and came back in 2008, it was already the cry baby circle jerk that eventually killed it.
And it least i came in time to watch it twitch and die.
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jun 18
Owner Zach Black
Apr 14
No need to speculate. I spoke with Xear the owner. The server 600 club on was so old it could not be updated and 600 club's activity was at a all time low ( as is SIN and ... I think other than LTTD that is all of us left ) now is a good time to do it..
He has intentions of returning but nothing is certain and no time framegiven.
szemtex
Jun 18
I hope it returns. Not because BS that has been posted in last couple of years . There was lot of valuable information in some the older posts.
Dark Enlightenment
Jun 18
Older posts were great. Especially before me when it was predominately antitheists posting.
Then the main person inspiring most of that awesome content left in disgust (over it being a nepotistic cry baby circle jerk apparently). Following that everyone else of merit lost their interest. Sadly, there were no other cult of personality with an opinion that motivated anyone to post. The few that could've done it, didn't, retired, or film their bathroom now, and the one that did try to become the face of that place was the rhetorical equivalent of Bill O'Reilly playing a thetan auditor, and actually prevented it's resurgence in the process.
That's my take anyway.
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jun 18
Anna
Jun 19
People often forget that a forum is its owner's property, to do what he pleases with it; develop it or screw it, delete or sell it. It seems obvious, yet for the senior users, for whom posting on a particular forum becomes a habit, the venue becomes a sort of home or a commune, which they feel responsible for. Such thinking is a trap that usually leads to disappointment. If the owner and/or his administration team doesn't care or has a different vision of the network than the most vocal members, then no cults of personality or self-proclaimed aristocracy will help. At best, they can keep barking at the moon.
Dunno if you meant Sin in your reply, but like her or not, she did everything in her power to boost activity there.
The Forum post is edited by Anna Jun 19
Dark Enlightenment
Jun 19
Lol. Sure.
I believe X is the cause of Y, and here is my suppoting argument.
I dont know, I am not convinced. And that is my entire rebuttal.
Will you acknowledge the fucking argument?
Why you trying to convince me? You need identify why you need me to agree with you.
Because it's a fucking debate and your rhetoric is an encyclopedia of latin things that start with the prefix 'ad'.
And once you see it, it's no longer fun. It's like watching Glenn Beck after he sold out all his integrity to Fox News, or a scientologist thetan auditor.
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jun 19
Anna
Jun 19
By boosting activity, I meant engaging people and that doesn't need to have anything to do with a method of argumentation. What you and some other supposedly intelligent people seem not to grasp is that such things like "quality content", "users of merit" are subjective. What it means to me, probably means something different to you. The more members a network has, the harder it is to reach consensus. Usually, the administrators decide what "quality" means. Or it might be done by members and then it become a circle jerk. In any case, there will always be those who will dispute it. This shit is not carved in stone.
The same goes for the art of debating. We could argue for hours and I'm pretty sure we would both end up feeling like winners. Unless there would be people voting with their thumb ups or downs. In that case, one could always say the jury is biased. Because it is, no way around it. Keeping that in mind might save a lot of hurt feelings.
Dark Enlightenment
Jun 19
You know what, I will give you that. Engaged the hell out of me.
Perhaps you can answer a question I still have about her and that.
As you may not remember or care about, I always went out of my way to react to her. To always take the bait. And all she had to do was ridicule me for not resisting some trigger that was so damn important to her. Which is why I always reacted.
My question is, it is still really bizarre as to why the independent, lone shewolf lesbian (in no need of anyone) was so very devoted to my following her advice and "getting it", why is that?
Was it some "Imaginationland abstract dating game" I missed? I mean, because she certainly acted like a pissed off spouse over it. Needed a 'point of view gun', I reckon. Subservience and no sex? Ideas of possibilities of relationships? Wtf am I suppose to do with those put them in a tub and clean myself with them? Because that's what 3 in 1 shampoo/conditioner/body wash is for, Anna.
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jun 19
Anna
Jun 20
"As you may not remember..."
I was there every day. And definitely (I'm 100% sure of that), nobody has ever ridiculed you for "not resisting the trigger that was so damn important." You were and still are the only person talking about it. I remember Jones' favourite argument "You don't get it" but it was used in her discussions with almost EVERYONE. Stop pulling things out of your ass.
The Forum post is edited by Anna Jun 20
Dark Enlightenment
Jun 20
Yeah, you all know what you did. Not gonna get a non-evasive answer out of you. I shouldnt have expected it. Feigning ignorance just too easy.
If only I could go into the archive like I use to and find the several supporting instances of that. You can defend the porpoise all you want, but keep in mind this is the same person that publicly trashed this sites owner, and then secretly asked him to live on her couch.
Is that what you meant when you said I "should call and ask her, maybe I'll get laid."
Ooooo, did she want me to live on her couch too?
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jun 20
Anna
Jun 20
Excuse me, is your name Zach now? I thought we were talking about Canis.
You started trolling and going after her only three years ago. Not that hard to remember but it was you obsessing over her, not the other way round.
Dark Enlightenment
Jun 20
Well, how else to learn about a person then find out what their track record is. So I paid attention. Seems to get a lot of emails accusing her of things.
Anyway I just wanted to know if I could live on her couch too.
Not really, I hear her vagina is cursed and unable to get guys off.. Also have you ever hear that rumor? It was a dude until the 90's.
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jun 20
Dark Enlightenment
Jun 20
Ewwww, I don't want to have to actually interact with it. Maybe cut it a little. Tie it to a radiator and beat with reeds and starve it or something. That would take a while.
And I also really wish you were that Brian/Tracy Kober faggot Glee watching bitch I thought you were. That way I could mock you about you outcasted childhood to your fucking internet face, poor kid.
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jun 20
