Lucifer | Forum

Wolfie
Wolfie Jun 22 '21
Any Luciferians here? I know of one.


I'm developing a casual Luciferian practice. Atheistic, of course, and non-organizational. I have a succinct incantation that I use when the mood strikes me. See pic. (The illustration is by Jason Engle. The text and the visual composition are mine.)



 

MatthewJ1
MatthewJ1 Jun 22 '21

I like the 4 major characters – Satan, Lucifer, Leviathan and Belial (fire, air, water and earth).  

 

I have the closest connection with Satan and have tried to elaborate on my perception of the Prince of Darkness elsewhere in another thread. “He” really is the fire of Becoming.

 

I have a very strong connection to Leviathan. In fact, I instantly felt that connection when I considered that signifier. Leviathan for me is the lurker in the dark or the monster in the depths. Leviathan is such an appropriate signifier for the unconscious. I sort of get the same sense of the unconscious, when I reflect on Cthulhu or any of the creatures which Lovecraft forced up and out into the open. Water is an appropriate element.   

 

I don’t have a strong connection to Belial. I’m not sure why that is? The meaning just doesn’t jump out right now. I sort of associate Belial with the expanse and heat and desolation of the deserts or burning wastelands. There is nothing more to Belial than that I’m afraid.

 

I have a strong connection with Lucifer, but don’t necessarily identify as a Luciferian. It is the promethean aspect of Lucifer which appeals to me. I associate Lucifer with the utterly conscious and intentional in sharp distinction to and against the mindlessness of conformity or automatic dogmatic behavior or even purely instinctive behavior. Lucifer is the enlightened individual.

 

I think one can make an argument that all 4 of the major characters have a place in the composition of the individual who deeply identifies with them, and is hence a Satanist, or some other type of LHP influenced person.

Geraldo Respuesta NUTZ
Geraldo Respuesta Jun 22 '21
I identify with his self-immolative principle to throw down a flaming sword at the feet of indoctrinating/authoritative hypocrisy. 
The Forum post is edited by Geraldo Respuesta Jun 22 '21
Wolfie
Wolfie Jun 23 '21
Geraldo, your comment reminded me of something I once had pondered: the Crucifixion/Resurrection myth would make a lot more sense if the protagonist was Lucifer incarnate, rebelling against the indoctrinating/authoritative hypocrisy of Jehovah as represented by the Pharisees. Self-immolative, yes, but then victory is snatched from the jaws of defeat, as the protagonist rises and ascends as the catalyst for a New Luciferian Age.


Geraldo, one of your other personalities may enjoy the symbolism to be found in this scientific article: Self-Immolative Polymers


 

Wolfie
Wolfie Jun 23 '21
MatthewJ1, regarding Belial, this discussion of references to him in the Dead Sea Scrolls and then the very brief discussion of references to him in the Book of Jubilees is illuminating: Belial in Dead Sea Scrolls and Book of Jubilees per Wikipedia


To be honest, I don't like the air/fire/water/earth template for understanding Lucifer, Satan, Leviathan, and Belial, respectively. It forces our thoughts into unnecessary boxes. However, that being said, your analysis of Leviathan as the unconscious and Lucifer as consciousness is useful. We could then make Satan and Belial into reality and unreality (deception), respectively, bearing in mind that reality is the all in all, encompassing objective and subjective, conscious and unconscious, fact and falsehood, for even subjectivity and falsehood have their places in reality.


But I don't actually think in those terms. I'm not someone for whom TSB is so fundamental that it structures my philosophy. TSB was an appetizer, a preamble, a trailer for the movie.


For me, Satan is the more general, Lucifer the more specific. I use Satan as a symbol for the entire Left Hand Path in all its permutations. He rules it all. But he doesn't rule it alone. He is the Lord of Hell, and under him are many legions.


The foregoing paragraph illuminates my rationale for giving Satan the most general of assertions: "Fulfill your desires."


Lucifer, meanwhile, I give my incantation from the OP. Lucifer is the personification of the adept. That's why I also give him the Luciferian Rede, for which my muse and mentor was Baphomets. I attach it here, because it has a place in this thread.









Wolfie
Wolfie Jun 23 '21
Here are three more assertions that I consider Luciferian. All of them flow from prior conversations that I participated in on this message board. As I ponder the one in my immediately preceding post, and then these three, I realize LaVey would have endorsed all four, and that tells me LaVey was more than a little Luciferian, per my use of the term.








talisman
talisman Jun 23 '21
Satan, Lucifer, Samael and Leviathan sounds better. I don't know Belial, maybe it sounds good with Delilah , or Ba'al from diablo? 
Wolfie
Wolfie Jun 23 '21
talisman, I find I enjoy your non sequiturs when they're not belligerent, for example the one above. I like a non sequitur that just sits there, opaque, denying purchase to any mind seeking to grasp it, like a Zen koan, for example the one above. There's an art to it.


 

talisman
talisman Jun 23 '21
Of course there's an art to it. I'm an artist.
Berardo Rodriguez Member
Berardo Rodriguez Jun 23 '21
I see the four Princes of Hell not as material objects, but as  four stages of the psychological development of a human being , for example:

Lucifer: The stage of learning.

Leviathan: The stage of enrollment and entering into the nearest society. 

Belial: The stage of rebelling against the status quo, rules,  laws,  ordinances, and so forth of that society or family. 

Satan: The stage of opposition against anything contrary to  the self and the creation of a self kingdom. 

Geraldo Respuesta NUTZ
Geraldo Respuesta Jun 23 '21

Quote from Wolfie Geraldo, your comment reminded me of something I once had pondered: the Crucifixion/Resurrection myth would make a lot more sense if the protagonist was Lucifer incarnate, rebelling against the indoctrinating/authoritative hypocrisy of Jehovah as represented by the Pharisees. Self-immolative, yes, but then victory is snatched from the jaws of defeat, as the protagonist rises and ascends as the catalyst for a New Luciferian Age.


Geraldo, one of your other personalities may enjoy the symbolism to be found in this scientific article: Self-Immolative Polymers


 

Already is the Lucifer incarnate. 


I mean, even the bible fucks up and calls The Jeebis Morning Star. 


My hypothesis being he was a Cult of Personality that became an urban legend that morphed over  300 years as his story was written by 80 different fan boys. By Constantine they had enough of a cannon to put all the shit written together and say fuck all with the advancements of the Hellenistic period. 


Today it would probably be closer to, "And that's why I be like FUCK Rome!" 

The Forum post is edited by Geraldo Respuesta Jun 23 '21
Geraldo Respuesta NUTZ
Geraldo Respuesta Jun 23 '21
This one is good. 
Quote from Wolfie



You'd be surprised how often most seek comfort back in those immaterial chains. I don't get it myself but adversity somehow instills duality in people. Like enough of the negative imprints the abstract essence of God's cum in juxraposition.  It puts fuzzy bullshit on a pedestal of preference.  


It seems to be a path of least resistance to escaping discomfort.


Instead of confronting or pushing the reality of the situation one will insert an idea that gives them false hope, and do so deliberately for the benefit of clinging to a more pleasing belief. 


I'm all for that as a mundane coping mechanism but I will never relate to why this simple insertion of a benefit/detriment comparison can make duality more real. Ultimately ascribing positivity to one side and negativity to another. Why light becomes more valuable in darkness is beyond me. Seems just more shit that happens in aggregate with respect to position and previous decisions. 


In analogy it's putting the overheated billet into a safety of a water quench without considering all those stress fractures that will occur. 



The Forum post is edited by Geraldo Respuesta Jun 23 '21
Wolfie
Wolfie Jun 24 '21
Both of your posts were excellent, Geraldo.


Pulling insights together, I produced Lucifer's Charge, which I recite in my room in the dark of night, two small red candles burning, each in a miniature cast iron pot. The purpose of this is entirely psychological and entirely worth doing, because in psychology we live and move and have our being.



The Forum post is edited by Wolfie Jun 24 '21
donot
donot Sep 23 '21
Well, I like this thing with the candles. While it's purely psychological, it, in a sense, reverberates the iconic into reality. 
Aborior Translatione
The first step is recognition of "it". A lot of gate guarding apes autofail on that one. 


What is "it"? It's it, and it's a lot like a euphemism for fucking. 



 .

Can you feel it, see it, hear it today? 

If you can't then it doesn't matter anyway. 


The Forum post is edited by Aborior Translatione Sep 23 '21
Phil_Lopian
Phil_Lopian Sep 25 '21
Lucifurryanism:



donot
donot Sep 26 '21
In a way Lucifer does not forbid people to be touched by love and sentiment. In a way there's no difference about it, you're meager parts of the general conception: going straight to the iceberg.
Satanic International Network was created by Zach Black in 2009.
Certain features and pages can only be viewed by registered users.

Join Now

Donate - PayPal