I am a Satanic Psycic | Forum

Fuck IA. He can try to bugger every guy in Texas. That doesn't bother me in the least.

What I want to know is why Ms Chloe considers everyone stupid here. If this is true, then why is she so much bothered by stupid people's criticism?

I would wish Ms Chloe named "those certain two people who keep messing with her threads" and said why she abandoned her safe space she was co-moderating, that was free from those two people, and came back here.

I would also like to know why she was bringing her grievances to yet another friendly and another network, complaining about the hostile atmosphere here and constant attacks. I want to ask what the reason for her complaints was if everyone is apparently so stupid here. After she names the two jerks, my question is why she considers them the "weed that is sucking life out of the forum" and what "intelligent users" they chased away.

Is this too much to ask? I don't expect people to get along with each other. I can understand open hostility or apathy/indifference. But I'm sick and tired of classic narcissistic passive - aggressive bullshit. 

It's her damned thread after all. What's the better place to state directly what her issues are with this forum and the people here? For once, she can be honest or continue with the covert animosity.

I don't really see anything wrong with this. People log in; some make posts and share ideas. There is bantering and also pointless discussion. It's just an observation, and it's all true to varying degrees.

Her demeanor doesn't require any articulation or explanation as far as I'm concerned, but were I to go that extent. I would say she's just very intelligent and has somewhat high standards; writes more than anyone else I know of which I have read some, but as for the bulk of that am somewhat at a loss.

Everyone has their niche here. Anna writes a lot and is also intelligent, CM is just some other bizarre kind of animal, and I like reading Baphomets et al maybe a few. These are all intelligent people, and I'm not sure about the rest. There are a lot of shit posts that the Watchers like to point out, and that's fine by, and doesn't involve me. There was this one Polish chick that used to fuck with me on a different forum, but not so much anymore.

Could you post these relevant comments? 

See, that's why paranoia pays. She didn't talk down to me, but I'm the only one who chases people away, and the ones I target are the superstitious minded. So if what you say is correct, as I always suspected, everything said is disingenuous.  That seems a common thread of all the prominent "women in satanism" actually.  And likewise, their likely goals in Satanism have been eliminated as antinomian. It shows an underlying pathological animosity towards those who don't hold religious superstition or some cosmic indoctrination. A hatred of nihilism and materialism probably. No room for channels of fluff and whatnot. 

Meh,  people online exist a lot like hypothetical alien life would, there is every reason to assume from the start they are malevolent (to your well-being) and have only their own interest in mind. 

I can't see her driving a yellow Toyota Matrix with fundy Christian Jesus power stickers all over it, or can I??? 

Angels tell her to fight a weird stalker holy war for her country too? Did her insight role Addy Hope Whatever jump off a bridge in 2012, because the first one using that name is supposed to be dead. Hmm. :/

And, as history repeats: its the same factors that is now killing Satanic International Network. SIN has been braindrained. All of the cool users [those with social creds] and the users who are intelligent have left it. All that are left are dumb people, pseudo-trolls, and trolls [mostly my socks]. Zach has had a girlfriend for a while, and is most often abscent from SIN. He has no sense of whom his Valued Users are or what type of user is valuable. Being abscent: SIN delapidates. 

We all know what a Troll is. A "Pseudo-Troll" is a user, who does not flood a Forum with incoherent things just to fuck up a Forum. Pseudo-Trolls can be smart, but they consistently antagonize posts and threads, making excahnge and posting quality content hard or not worth the effort, because such pseudo-trolls constantly attack and criticisze everything posted or written which they don't agree with, believe in, or which contradicts their worldviews and opinions...

when you do not know or understand which user or what type of user is valued/valuable to you and your Forum's life, then you lose them, if you allow your Forum to become a place where people anagonize them and the things they post and share...

I'm writing this, because I'm hoping that you guys... will be able to learn by example from MySatan and SIN, and perhaps not do what they did or are doing [or not doing]... not only do you have to constantly tend that Garden, but you also have to learn what plants you value, to learn to remove the weeds before they choke your garden and eat up its nutrients...

I've been looking for a forum or place like Anna, where I can post and share ideas without any pseudo-trolls. 

The earlier comment from AK' forum about "how great it is to discuss Satanism without certain two people messing with your thread" I can't find. But it was there.

And seriously, she's persistently mocking people here in a subtle indirect way. It all looks like a classic pattern of passive - aggressive behavior to me.

I simply want sincere direct answers, like this: "I abhor this person because....", "I have an issue with..." Just some honest feedback/explanation.

Oh Jesus. I forgot about that.

Dunno what my auditor is going to say.

I will probably have to repeat all the sessions.

I might want to look for the third job so that I can afford going clear completely.

Like what else? Will you go Frater Lucypurr's way and diagnose me with childhood trauma and shit?

Why do all insecure bitches have to presume that everyone who calls them out suffered abuse in childhood?

I asked simple and clear questions. I want to hear from this bitch (preferably, unless you're just another satanic psycic) what her problem is with me and, possibly, other people here. Because there aren't so many people here, right?

And I do care for the same reason anyone who reads or posts stuff here cares. I might bring it all down to absurdity and ask you why you even care to log in.

See, this is why I don't read shit about Satanism, having written most of it off as black tinted mysticism anyways. 

And if what you say is true my antitheism baited someone completely different than intended.  I guess that's what is meant by "...and see who comes running out". 

Superstition has had thousands of years to take over every idea and make itself primary, now it's time for logical fallacy to breed confirmation bias based beliefs out of existence.

Never saw myself as a "pseudo-troll" doing that either.  I was jus' manifesting as the adversary to the adversary is all.  Or a maybe a bigger douchebag version of Hitchens with plastic devil horns. 

Never mind. Fuck it. Nothing will come out of it.

Still, the invitation for Ms C to talk shit straight to anyone's face remains open if she ever feels like it.

Until that time... let's be back to the casual pointless banter.

This is just another inductive reasoning fallacy like at the beginning of the thread, and just something else for me to split hairs over...

If 'my reasoning' for engaging certain forum related stuff is "absurd", then ALL reasoning and forum related stuff is absurd.

And although I do have my share of feeling "absurd", in my particular case I think it's just a transitory thing coming down from all that good weed I've been smoking these days.

"Chloe is angry because theistic and/or spiritual discussions are pathologically shot down. And it allegedly provokes passive aggressive contempt". 

/\ that (and the following) assumes I am one who ruins all meaningful topics and chases away valuable users. Because I have to be one of the two. 

What gets me is why would someone who posts an Osho video, and allegedly agrees with it, get so angry at antitheistic criticism. Especially towards those speaking about occult topics in an absolute  AND PRETENTIOUS manner. It says that person secretly detests that Osho point of view. And even more bizarrely considers it as some sort of nihilist bait.  

In any case I have an entirely personal reason for being that pseudo troll. 

 I go after topics that defer to abstraction. That keep the arguer programmed to faithful superstition. I see that as the universally defining trait of the RHP.  And I only share that here, the adversarial environment it seems most logical in.  The one I can mock the ethereal realm of spirits and dark acausal gods in. I mean I suppose someone could throw a wishbone, but what's that gonna do, make me eat my words via lightning strike?  And it's not like I go to a bible study and do it. 

I guess almost everyone really is programmed to be a half step away from twelve more when the chips are down and the bottle is empty. 

And like the Antichtist or Lao Tzu says: 

"Compassion is beneficial to survival BECAUSE the universe is inherently hostile and indifferent to your existence... And also you have no free will. Deal with it." 

...but that's not going to happen so this is what I am doing instead.

The difference is that I don't have much against theists unless they are either extremely fanatical or extremely stupid. It's mainly Frater Lucy type of a person that attracts my hostility and contempt. Debating theists is pointless to me as you really can't reason with them. It's belief. It's faith. It's stronger than reason and I know that. Besides, I adjust myself to the house rules more or less (sometimes more, sometimes less) but, at the very least, I try to. So I simply joined the STS forum to read, see what it is all about and take part in some neutral general discussions. Certainly, I didn't intend to jump into threads and mock everything the spiritual folks say and argue the shit out of them. It doesn't even interest me. And sure as fuck, it wasn't my intention to go after poor Ms C and subject her to some groundless criticism there.

So I wanted to ask what the reason was for that shit-talk of hers that appeared immediately after she entered there. I didn't even manage to make the first post. It's not that I'm in love with that forum or something. It's just that such covert indirect hostility infuriates me but I didn't want to cause melodrama there. Since it was in the general context of SIN and about it, I preferred to ask her here, in her own trolololol thread, especially that it wasn't an isolated incident of passive aggressive behavior. If some choose to read it as "being triggered", "over-reacting" or "caring too much" so be it. If I have something against someone, I prefer saying it straight to their faces. This way, they can always explain or retort if they think the criticism isn't valid. I don't fancy covert or implied passive aggressive bullshit at all.

Ah, got it, "STS", which I guess isn't a NASA acronym.

 That doesn't count. To the moon!