Loading...

Something and You | Forum

Dark Enlightenment
Simple Statement: I can't prove it therefore I can.

For some, the fluff bunny shit bugs them most, for me the mutual inclusiveness of blind faith and LHP gets me.  Neither of the previous are anything approaching "it". But lets focus on the latter as it relates.

The existance of the creation paradox is a pandora's box of cascading streams of fundamentally flawed causal connections.  Connections in which a lack of data is all the data. They are known by being superflous.

"If god created the universe what created god, and god always existed why couldn't the universe in some form"

Strangely, one of these actually wins occam's razor for being the least complex. The addition of god is unnecessary and is interchangeable with anything you fucking want. A cosmic piece of gouda cheese perhaps. It's unnecessary.

A soul is another thing that apologetically exists. Another nothing thing that exists in a one way folklore (unless you're hindu) you paste to yourself because no one can prove it otherwise.

OBE's and NDE's are two more pieces or rubbish that should be discarded into the litter bin at once.  Each of them overlook the entire field of neuroscience to draw their unnecessary and interchangeably superflous conclusions.

Things of this nature.

This is at the core of everything.  The use of the superflous nonsense as a primary method of attainment is possibly the furthest thing from LHP out west. It seems like it must be a localized mutation in man's genetic predisposition.  The almost natural tendency to fall into the indoctrination.  To please. 

And of course those who react adversely to it. To being told of its uses.  To being told. They react through not only a rejection of what they are told, but respond by deliberately pissing on what they are told.

In the west that is rooted in taking a triangle into your whatever so you can go play a harp on a cloud.  The predisposition in western RHP is one toward blind faith in superflous bullshit.

The antithesis should be a rejection of the superflous and need for notions to erroneously give one meaning. 
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Apr 14
Share:
Anna
Anna Apr 14
"This is at the core of everything.  The use of the superflous nonsense as a primary method of attainment is possibly the furthest thing from LHP out west. It seems like it must be a localized mutation in man's genetic predisposition.  The almost natural tendency to fall into the indoctrination.  To please.

And of course those who react adversely to it. To being told of its uses.  To being told. They react through not only a rejection of what they are told, but respond by deliberately pissing on what they are told."

Faith is not based on logic, neither does it require a proof. Otherwise, it wouldn't be called faith. It would be science.

Both the religious fundamentalists and their atheistic opponents are guilty of the belief in the superficial bullshit i.e., they treat the religious myths, which are esoteric and occult, exoterically. They take literally what by its nature is metaphorical. The God, the Self, is known by many names; Christ, Osiris, Inanna, Persephone, Odin, Buddha etc. I like the Jungian interpretation of the resurrection myth the most. One must descend into oneself to be reborn; to become the Whole undivided. Thus, becoming one's own God gets a new meaning. But it's not only about the self. The resurrection myths express the constant cycle of death and rebirth of Nature; the perpetual renewal through sacrifice.

In the East, there is no conflict between RHP and LHP. They both are paths leading to the same destination; achieving godhood. They are treated like tools in the toolbox so the mixture of both ways is possible. The Western mind accustomed to duality managed to totally skew the concept of LHP. Parroting Blavatsky - that's all we are doing here.

When it comes to most of theistic satanists, they are reverse Christians treating Satan as a good Daddy figure, the same way Christians treat Jesus. 
Don Luciferi
Don Luciferi May 15
Quote from Anna
When it comes to most of theistic satanists, they are reverse Christians treating Satan as a good Daddy figure, the same way Christians treat Jesus. 

Theistic Satanists don't claim to be reverse Christians. 
http://theisticchurchofsatan.webs.com
The Forum post is edited by Don Luciferi May 15
Anna
Anna May 15
I don't care about anyone's claims. I could claim I'm a fairy. Would you believe me?
Don Luciferi
Don Luciferi May 15
But you do care to tell what theistic Satanists are...
Certain features and pages can only be viewed by registered users.

Join Now

Donate

This site is largely funded by donations. You can show your support by donating. Thanks. Every dollar helps.

Like and Share