The black house | Forum

Yeah, but the only reason people talk to you is the challenge it's become to get you to understand your own fallacies. 

When you lace your comments with myopic personal experience and rationalizations for why you were treated poorly you have really said, "This is all about me, but I only want you to discuss me if you agree that I am right."

Your attempted LBM, which bleeds through as insecure mental gymnastics, opens you up to the treatment you consistently receive. 

There was a tag given to the most deserving of folk once upon a time at a site far far away, LaVey came up with the term.

Good luck, Intellectual Black Hole, may you forever emit only Derp Radiation from your event horizon.  

Therefore I would call the former by OP fallacy exhibit number one.

Edit : spacing

What your silly head cannot grasp is that the standards or rules don't have to be written. You mentioned tribes but tribal societies have their oral traditions. These are the rules that regulate the tribe's life and are passed from generation to generation. These so called unwritten honor codes let differentiate tribe members from outsiders. You don't live in a tribal culture but you're part of the Western society that is highly individualistic. Satanism is one of its expressions. It doesn't have clear standards or rules, like the religion has. It doesn't have an oral tradition like a tribal society has. And it doesn't have clear criteria for the label because everyone has different imaginings as to what Satanism is and what it means to be Satanic. The only thing that you have is various organizations setting their own rules of admission and various individuals creating their own "personal philosophies." If there is no consensus when it comes to the objective criteria for the label, you can't call anyone a pretender or faker. Or you can but you will be pulling shit out of your ass.

"You are called Satanic if you simply behave like Satan."

Satan is mentioned in the Bible only once, in the book of Job. The word means the adversary of God's chosen people. By that vague definition and depending on how you understand "God's chosen people", TST fits in fine because they oppose Christians and the Nazis fit in too because they hate the Jews. The rest is Milton, Divine Comedy, folk tales and modern horror movies. Satan stimulated people's imagination for centuries but one would have a hard time coming up with a concise meaning of the word. Even if one goes by the dictionary definition that Satan is an accuser or God's enemy and humanity tempter, then that also suits TST and Nazis.

"The pretenders wouldn't do that by nature."

I already told you that TST has its gatherings, ceremonies and communities in the form of chapters. It was them who revived the idea of grottos, stressing the need to meet other Satanists and creating the communities with the aim of socializing, conducting ceremonies and engaging in social activism. They have basically the same mindset as you. So what's your damn point?

"That was one of the primary reason why LaVey created the church of Satan."

On the contrary. One of the reasons why LaVey grew disillusioned with the church clergy and started selling titles for money, also disbanded grottos was people treating their membership as a sort of an achievement instead of focusing on doing their best in their life. This was the kind of people, like you, psychic vampires in need of some community which they could belong to and desperately cling to, thinking mere membership and the label makes them the "alien elite." 

Quote:

There are many important things to discuss these days because we have a serious problem with TST and modern social medias that are administrated by fascists. Black houses could be a replacement of the social medias for Satanists.

This statement also has bits of "Dicto simpliciter", "Post hoc ergo proctor hoc", and a few others.  

Simply put you let your bias conclude that your experience is because of fascist people that don't understand you, or making false assumptions to conclude "x" is why you receive "y" treatment. 

When you claim that I commit a fallacy then you need to back it up. Anyone can claim that you commit a fallacy and there are many people these days that wants to make people think you are an idiot. This is Anna's goal which is why I no longer listen to her as she demonstrates no value to offer.

What the fuck does Melek Taus have to do with Satanism? He's a representative of God. A good guy. By adding more ambiguity to the term, you're proving my point.

Just like you've just proved the fallacy pointed out to you.

You're like a bedbug, dude. Not a psychic vampire even, just an annoying bedbug. You come back over and over again, leeching on the groups you join, desperately needing inclusion and pushing on everyone your turds of bullshit wisdom.

If anyone is a faker, it's You

You are nothing but inductive logic fails.

This guy is a troll. Nobody can be that stupid. 

I don't think you are capable of looking at yourself.  I provided several examples. 

But let's do "false dilemma" one specifically.

Dilemma = Black houses are an alternative to forums that are overrun by fascists that pose as Satanists to seek to make people look stupid".

That dilemma ONLY exists to support your argument. The dilemma is false because you have an invalid assumption as to the cause of X. That's the Post Hoc Ergo Procter hoc fallacy.  

If you were capable of looking at yourself subjectively, and not deferring to it all as an Ad hom, you might just realize your treatment here, the one you consistently encounter, may be for another reason entirely. Perhaps one you consistently refuse to accept. 

THAT YOU ARE NOT A SATANIST AND YOU CANT EVEN EXPLAIN WHAT SATANISM IS.

That is just one possible alternative cause. It could also be your persona to talk like you have the knowledge to do so... in any language.  

Part A: the written part that would be widely accepted here and used for its' label and during discussion conveniently conflated with part B.

Part B: the 'unwritten' illusive part fashioned by the OP that mysteriously identifies "pretenders" via individual characteristics that are not to be associated with defining the label in any way shape or form.

So I'm not sure what the deal is here really; maybe that's the point.

Quote from Tom RiddleThis is again a straw man. I never said that characteristics identifies pretenders. It's the satanic RELIGION that creates the barrier between the Satanists and the pretender and the pretenders are revealed through their reactions...

Edit : spacing