Oh shit, now you got me defending shit like you would. You finally have an actual argument though, which has been noted.The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one's own.
But they also say One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason
I think it serves as "Personal Relations". They have less POLITICAL VIABILTY as a lobbyist group (which they are by default) if they espouse eye for an eye. They have to whitewash the appearance to make it palatable for consumption. It serves to win over Christians.
And when they're called godless baby killers that troll Christians they can pull up the thing that says, "we act with compassion, but it's unreasonable to dictate the legality of the vaginal use of vacuum cleaners". Caveats abound.
What happened serving their wills which align as a group? So they lie about compassion for PR purposes. Who cares?
Do you really think they mean that?
Remember they are only targeting HALF of western society. The Christian half. That is almost always Republican.
