Pseudo-Satanists Post On Forums, True Satanists Post On WordPress. | Forum

By the way, it seems my clickbait now links to "This page is missing. Are you sure it was ever here?" Now, I only need someone to dim the lights to make the gaslighting all the more suggestive.

Also if it looks like a Nazi and quacks like a Nazi, it's a Nazi, and let me just say, Fuck Nazis.

The only interesting aspect of ONA thought is their exploration of the original understanding of the Left Hand Path; I.e., Vamachara; wherein practitioners deliberately violated the most deeply held taboos in order to promote spiritual awakening.

I like the irony of ripping off Kaballah/Freemasonry/A:.A:./OTO, changing the esoteric tree, mechanism of divinity, and getting people to do Hasidic Jewish-derived occultism in the name of "The Aeon of The Nazi Superman". 

But it transgresses the liberal takeover like so many capital insurrectionists...

So I'm just going to ask, what is the social taboo when half of the society is the demographic of The Crossroads of the West Gun Show and other half is the audience of an Ariana Grande concert?

What you transgress 'for spirituality' still reflects some part of a social dynamic on a situational basis. 

I feel that is a necessary component. There needs to be a 'fire' in that social trampling for it have 'spiritual' benefit. It needs to directly speak to specific incident in the style of eye for an eye morality. 

For example:

If you feel the precept of "loving everyone" and "feeling bad for the less fortunate" is flawed by missionary or social justice bullshit you are less likely to look with empathy at the homeless jackass.  Especially ones that knowingly walk in front of traffic, stop in front of your car, and then scream at you until you know they're having bad day.  

Society says "they're sick and can't help it".  Still, a spiritual benefit to such a person (who is sick of that social coddling of helpless people who deserve to be fucked with) may be getting out of their car and knocking the drug addicted schizo unconscious... for their attainment. Not that they were really considering the legality of 'assault' when done. 

I feel occurrences of Satanism are cause/effect situations (like that) and can only happen as real responses to real things. 

If the deed doesn't make you want to toss the practitioner into a piranha-infested lake, then it isn't Vamachara.

But in non-conspiracy reality you are correct. 

There are other (classical vamachara) LHP things you can do in the West that attack taboo without doing the shit that gets you killed with a chair in prison.  

All you really gotta do is find what's sacred and shit on it. 

You could set up a church promoting suicide as a form of environmentalism as an example. 

Children are great but you can use them other ways. Like cancer kids. What about getting Yo Gabba Gabba characters to sing songs about bone marrow and hospices outside the door to a Children's Hospital? 

You just gotta ask, "will this anger the morality of the average person?" Which come in provoked and unprovoked forms.

Although people hate him, Boyd Rice is great example of the two forms of LHP transgression. 

Unprovoked: More humorous. Giving a severed goats head to Nancy Reagan just to do it.  

Provoked: More carnival barking. The 8-8-88 rally at the height of the Satanic Panic. (The more firey a nd adversarial of the two) 

I said all that because I think some reactions to a video about animal abuse would be the visceral reflex, not moral indignation. Not virtue signaling. If I happened upon someone who was torturing a dog, I would see red. I might kill the person. It wouldn't be Superego. It would be Id. And the Id is a savage.

Having thought through all that, I'm left unsure as to how far Vamachara would go. Would practitioners limit themselves to transgressions that merely violate childhood training? Or would they go so far as to infuriate the Id? I'm guessing it would depend on the practitioner.