Satanic high mass | Forum

I say brilliant things to her like CM and Anna to this dude, laid to waste and unappreciated, although at least here other listeners make it worthwhile, but for me I can only hope that possibly some invisible or inconspicuous entities are present and assimilating so my words do not fall to an infinite void of nothingness.

And there is the humorous side of things as well as I often present in which the aforementioned also applies.

She appears conditioned and brainwashed into patterns and behavior that is difficult if not impossible to break much of the time. It is what it is though for the moments in question and of course other times there are the forums and on occasion otherwise.

This is weak sauce, man. Get your shit straight or you will always be the source of endless comedy.

I realize it looks like throwing pearls before swines but as you said this is a public forum with some other people reading, hopefully. Without it only blogging remains and  that would be much less fun. This is a better venue to express one's points than Wordpress because there are some discussions here. And that guy is quite entertaining in his stupidity. 

And also I believe that one person here may be getting a bit excessively annoyed, but it isn't her.

THE SECOND HALF OF THE SATANIC BIBLE WAS ADDED AFTER THE PUBLISHER WOULDN'T PUBLISH SUCH A SHORT BOOK. IT WAS ADDED TO FILL SPACE. 

Didn't the inclusion of John Dee's made up language tip you off? Why not just use pig Latin or sing about little lambs and ivy? The shit MOST PULLED out his ass you've mananged to build an ironic interpretation of Satanism around.

Let's return to this again...

Quote from Tom Riddle
The first half is outdated as it takes place in LaVey's periode of time where the society was a lot different. 

IT CAN'T BE OUTDATED BECAUSE THIS IS THE PART THAT IS SUPPOSED TO SPEAK TO THE PERSONALITY OF THE SATANIST. 

Along the lines of: 

"OH MY LOGIC, LAVEY HAS THE SAME VIEW ON REVENGE I DO! THATS EXACTLY WHAT I'VE ALWAYS SAID! HE ALSO THINKS DIVINE THINGS ARE WRITTEN BY MAN TOO! EXACTLY!" 

And so on finding parallels in similar life-applicable situations.

Now, I want you scrap your derp together and answer the question: Where in the last half of TSB do you read what's written and say,

"EXACTLY. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I HAVE ALWAYS SAID!"

?????

If you treat "magic" as a substitute for God expecting it to grant you your desires, then you are simply a theist disguised as a "doubter."

I ask you again... Do you even understand what IDC is?

Tom Riddle: I encourage people to acknowledge that ceremony and holiday makes Satanism. Without that there is no Satanism. The symbol of Satan would be useless and pointless.

Quite disingenuous and misleading, sir…

Over the years I have noticed a certain trend in people who claim the descriptor Satanist, but whose claims to that title are dubious. They usually accept some parts of The Satanic Bible and then ignore, exclude, downplay, gloss over or whitewash the rest of the book. It’s usually the Redbeard part, which receives this poor treatment.

Such is the case here, I think. You can’t claim to be a Satanist, as per LaVey’s definition and discount or downplay up to one half of TSB. You just can’t ignore up to one half of the book by fetishizing the parts on ritual and ceremony, and whitewashing or rationalizing the rest away.  

Again, as stated elsewhere, Satan is the personification of the LHP and hence, as a result, Satanism is a left hand path philosophy/religion/praxis - greater and lesser magic, as a consequence of this correct orientation, are merely tools to be used or not used by the Satanist as needed. Magic isn’t an exclusive end in itself.

I think the LHP, which LaVey pointed to, involves an alchemical process. That is a praxis which is designed to incinerate, isolate and refine. It is designed to liberate the individual from the accumulated detritus of social programming and other RHP conditioning to reveal something more “pure” through transgression or antinomianism or self-overcoming, if you want to use that sort of language.

Further, it must surely be clear, that LaVey adopted a Darwinian, Social-Darwinian and Nietzchean position. I think there is a lot of evidence to support that claim. Accordingly, the modus operandi of this LHP journey is will to power, might is right and survival of the fittest.    

Satanism consequently is about dominance, about controlling circumstances, states of affairs and others as far as you can, to bring about change in conformity with your will. This is the context within which any magical practice takes place. The end point of this LHP is to obtain tangible real world results. It is about gaining as much power and pleasure as possible. It is about control. That’s where liberation and so called “I-theism” lies I think.

@Tom Riddle

If someone here doesn't understand the chapter regarding the intellectual decompression chamber, it is you. It's not about the suspension of the doubt but of certainty. CERTAINTY. This is what you got wrong. The certainty that the supernatural doesn't exist, just like pink elephants don't exist. It has always been addressed to declared atheists, not wishy-washy seekers or theists fancying themselves doubters.

I even quoted the relevant part. Should I quote it again?

Or maybe, like Canis, should I post the entire chapter? Or better, post the entire second part of the book to show how twisted your ideas are. Not that it would get through to you because you're blinded by your cognitive biases and only see what you want to see. There was the time I remember, you were prattling about deities and your devotion to them. Now you parade as a "doubter", desperately seeking justification for your hidden theistic inclinations, which you don't even have enough honesty to admit.

If you were intellectually honest, then you would state that you are not a Satanist but you're fond of the Satanic decor and find it useful. That would be fair enough. But you not only claim the label which fits you like Barbie's dress fits a cow but also have a nerve to claim that only you get it while the entire population of Satanists doesn't.

Now, if your excessive pride was coupled with some intelligence, erudition and arguments that would actually stand in a debate, it would be less annoying. I'm not evaluating people's characters. But by God, you don't have even the slightest clue what you're pontificating about. And it is all about really simple stuff that should be understood by an average idiot, even if that average idiot isn't a Satanist.

You can walk the LHP without being a Satanist. The goal of the LHP is apotheosis. It's an esoteric practice that origins in hinduism. Satanism can be a wheel on the path but so can buddhism...

I don't ignore the first half of TSB. I focus on the second part because it seems so overlooked. Many of these individuals here don't even know what the intellectual decompression means but yet they call it bullshit. It's TIDC that is my reason to reject "branches of Satanism" and state that Satanism is Satanism. In that Satanic High Mass we see in the video could in theory easy have spiritual or theistic Satanists in the ceremony without they knew. They could have participants who despised each others or where not away they were there on the same time.

The problem with social darwinism is that I don't see modern Satanists actually live after it. If you lived after that philosophy you would end in jail or be destroyed if you encountered the wrong person. Social darwinism are not even supported by modern science on evolutionary biology. The human animal cooperates for survival and triumph. 

However as I pointed out then Book of Satan could be recited by the high priest in ceremony on the satanic holidays as a psychodrama.