Satanic high mass | Forum

The "intellectual decompression chamber" of the Satanic temple might be considered a 

training school for temporary ignorance, as are ALL religious services! The difference is that the Satanist KNOWS he is practicing a form of contrived ignorance in order to expand his will, whereas another religionist doesn't - or if he does know, he practices that form of self-deceit which forbids such recognition. His ego is already too shaky from his religious inculcation to allow himself to admit to such a thing as self-imposed ignorance

Do you understand the difference between KNOW and DOUBT? Knowing implies certainty. Doubt is NOT knowing.

Although I think your intellect is suspended permanently. For example,

"The human animal cooperates for survival and triumph." 

This is just one side of the coin. Are you going to ignore the other one, like you ignore the other part of TSB? Are you going now to rewrite Mommy Nature's Bible because you don't like half of it? 

Quote from Anna I think your intellect is suspended permanently. For example,

And honestly, this is the closest you've got on anything, and that says a lot. 

LHP does come from Hinduism and here is what Wikipedia will now say for me on this: 

Vāmācāra is a Sanskrit term meaning "left-handed attainment" and is synonymous with "Left-Hand Path" or "Left-path". It is used to describe a particular mode of worship or sadhana that is not only "heterodox" to standard Vedic injunction, but extreme in comparison to the status quo. 

So if LHP is apotheosis; it is the apotheosis of what? Attaining the highest form of what? 

What is a heterodox mode of attainment? Sure as fuck isn't suspension of disbelief in ritual practice. Or anything confined in ones home, really. Status quo says that's your right. What is LHP about more rituals and ideas unless it's used to elicit a response? 

Thats why It's actually more in line (and this is not a matter of debate) with what SHOCKS "Vedic Injunction". In Christianland Godless antagonism seems to work.  If you've ever been to US state of Georgia, that is absolutely the devil holding an abortion raffle. At least on the part of the person who came up with the idea. And if you travel to other US locales that can be a Hitler impersonator holding a eugenics seminar. Really it depends on what part of the status quo you want to act extreme in opposition too and when.

It all depends on what you do OUTSIDE THE INTELLECTUAL DECOMPRESSION CHAMBER. 

Quote from Aborior Translatione Sure as fuck isn't suspension of disbelief in ritual practice.

https:///...-ebook/dp/B0024CEZR6

Amoral, cunning, ruthless, and instructive, this multi-million-copy New York Times bestseller is the definitive manual for anyone interested in gaining, observing, or defending against ultimate control – from the author of The Laws of Human Nature.

Start with Law #1: 

“Always make those above you feel comfortably superior.  In your desire to please or impress them, do not go too far in displaying your talents or you might accomplish the opposite – inspire fear and insecurity.  Make your masters appear more brilliant than they are and you will attain the heights of power.

You're a natural, you do that by default! I'm sure you'll determine you do it all perfectly.

And I fucking nailed you on your will to power. 

Now admit you want to be considered the best poster on this site. 

** Honestly, we all have will to power. For example I write simple classical music no one cares about. 

Full piece (ongoing)

"Thats why It's actually more in line (and this is not a matter of debate) with what SHOCKS "Vedic Injunction". In Christianland Godless antagonism seems to work.  If you've ever been to US state of Georgia, that is absolutely the devil holding an abortion raffle. At least on the part of the person who came up with the idea. And if you travel to other US locales that can be a Hitler impersonator holding a eugenics seminar. Really it depends on what part of the status quo you want to act extreme in opposition too and when."

Oh boy. Okay, I will try one more time.

Tom, you are the one who is stating that legitimate and genuine Satanism is codified or described in The Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey. This is the distinct impression you gave me.

If this is the case then every page and every word in that book describes legitimate and genuine Satanism. The entire book must be taken into account when determining what legitimate and genuine Satanism is, and whether one is a genuine and legitimate Satanist.

TSB states that Satanism is an LHP philosophy/religion/praxis. I’m not stating this as my personal opinion. I have merely deduced that claim from the fact that TSB itself states that Satan is the personification of the LHP. Satanism IS LHP as a result. There is no other option and if there is then you need to cite TSB, and provide quotes from that book, which contradict that claim.

If you say something different than that – in regards to Satanism and the LHP – then you have to make the argument, based on a reading of TSB, since you are the one who is stating that legitimate and genuine Satanism is codified or described in The Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey.

Whether you personally agree with Social Darwinism or not, or think that human beings achieve triumph or power in other ways besides Social Darwinism is irrelevant to the discussion. TSB contains Social Darwinist themes in abundance. Hence Social Darwinist themes are an essential part of legitimate and genuine Satanism.

Remember you are the one who insisted that TSB codified or described legitimate and genuine Satanism.        

One a side note*

Know you should conversating that you don't make me too good for write doing now.  I feel real declining from myself posting on forum that make for best dialog persuasion anymore. Brain I feel being eating by gelatin goo creatures. Not good. 

This is what many CoS adherents don't understand. LaVey is not the prophet of Satanism. He was just the first Satanist to create a church dedicated to Satan which brought birth to Satanism as a religion. Remember that Satanists are born and not made, so if they are that they have always been among our specie.

Because that could explain it too.

In another thread you were constantly accusing people of not having read TSB. You talk about the chapter about IDC as if it was a gospel. Your constant backpedalling is truly pathetic.

You consider your twisted notion of what Satanism is to be a fact and constantly call the people who disagree with you ignorant or pretenders while, at the same time, you claim you don't do it. 

If Satanism is about self deification, then why the hell can't someone use the archetype as a tool to achieve one's goals? If you consider yourself as a god, then naturally you don't consider an archetype to be above you. All gods and archetypes are then man-made. Still you insist to the contrary. Why? Because you're a theist. A fanatical and hypocritical one. This is why you feel the need to revere and worship Satan. This explains your obsession with magic and rituals and also your fanaticism. You're the same guy who years ago claimed that Satanism was all about the worship of demons and dark deities. Although, all of your posts were deleted, I remember your pontifications from back then. Although you now parade as a "doubter", your theism shines through your posts, hence your fanatical obsession with IDC. Because you feel the need to practice and justify your theism.

Quote from Anna You're the same guy who years ago claimed that Satanism was all about the worship of demons and dark deities. Although, all of your posts were deleted,

You claimed: "A Satanist can't use Satan as a tool. Satan the archetype has no master."

Then you stated: "Satan is your ego externalized."

So I'm asking you again. If Satan is just my ego externalized and not some literal deity and I'm my own god, why can't I use Satan as a tool to gain my aim? Why can't I use it during an abortion rally if I want to? Or for any other purpose if this is my wish? Is this a sacrilege for you?